I didn't realize it was credited for the "running zombie". Liked it enough I put it in my rotation of "background movies" for a couple months.(The movies that you can stand being on for background noise, or watch a bit of now & then.) Now it's been so long since I've seen it that I can't remember what about it I liked so much or why I liked it all. S friend said I needed to watch it again, & give a for real chance. Itbwas the long stretch in the beginning, after he's left the hospital & is wandering/searching for ppl, just "hello?!?" over & over for a half hour (not exactly, I know). The first time I watched the first one I was a bit impatient toward it & considered ir boring. It's been so long since I've watched either of 'em I couldn't tell you why. I would have one panic attack, get slowed down, and then the infected would catch me and tear me to pieces. I suffer from a severe anxiety/panic disorder. The movie is excellent and gets the job done well i would just need a stronger constitution to truly enjoy it.Īnd no. I hated how that fuck left his wife to die.only for her to be saved, and then only for her to be ripped apart after all by her infected husband. However, it had some parts that were just emotionally devastating for me. all done with amazing camera work and acting versus the use of over-the-top gore and blood.Īs far as 28 Weeks Later.I do not regret having watched it. Chilling soundtrack, with hold-your-breath moments. I loved it then, and I love it to this day. So we watched it together, rented from a Blockbuster Video. I wanted to get into the horror genre, and my sister thought it was a great choice. Also, the response to Covid might have taught us that countries and people are often slow to react to these things, and that misinformation is rife, but it's also taught us that governments will take pretty serious measures at some point.Ģ8 Days is the first horror film I ever saw. If I remember correctly from the books, it takes months from the outbreak of literal zombies going around eating people before the public is informed. That way it's constantly and overtly trying to convince you how realistic it is that slow, dumb zombies manage to kill almost everyone in the world, even though someone basically has to get bit to be infected, after which there's a not insignificant delay before they turn themselves.Įdit: It's also interesting to read it now, and realize that it came out before smartphones (aka cameras) and video uploading/streaming platforms were common. I feel like I should know the answer to this but I honestly haven't watched the movie SINCE the DVD era and only barely remember seeing it in the theaters, where it very much looked like someone had plugged a handycam into the projector.Īnyway, I'm wondering if the timing of this miniseries just happens to land during one of those weird periods in a movie's post-theatrical life on streaming where the rights are just kinda ping-ponging around and it's sort of in one of the multiple weird limbos those movies sometimes end up in before reappearing.Yep! The World War Z formula is fun and interesting, but there's an extra layer of suspension of disbelief in it because the book is presenting it in a fact-finding, journalistic manner. A question I've always had about 28 Days Later:Ĭonsidering how it was shot, and what it was shot with - is there anything about the blu-ray that sets it apart from the DVD? My understanding is that basically the whole thing is more or less capped at 480p due to the Canon XL-1 they shot almost all of the movie on.ĭoes the blu-ray look better in those scenes? I'd assume the parts of the movie that they actually shot on 16 or 35mm at the end do in fact look better, but I guess I'm curious as to whether the movie benefits from the Canon footage being printed to film and then scanning THAT at high resolution?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |